9-1 Final Project Part One Submission
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
Turnitin™ enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
,
To complete this assignment, review the prompt and grading rubric in the Final Project Part One Guidelines and Rubric PDF document. When you have finished your work, submit the assignment here for grading and instructor feedback.
Important Note: You will submit not only your new content for this project, but also the content from the previous course—_ Final Project Part One—combining the final projects from both courses to complete one cohesive practical experience project document. However, you will only be graded on the new content for this course.
Be sure to utilize the Final Project Part One Template for this assignment. Note: To complete this template, replace the bracketed text with your own content. Keep any other writing in place, including the headings, subheadings, and tables.
,
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: _ Final Project Part One Guidelines and Rubric
Print
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Results: Report
16.03 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
reports with complete clarity the results of each of the project
goals and whether the results were expected
14.43 points
Reports the results of each of the project goals and whether the
results were expected
11.22 points
Reports the results of the project goals but does not include
whether they were expected, or report lacks sufficient detail or is missing results for some project
goals
0 points
Does not report the results of the project goals
Score of Results: Report,/ 16.03
Results: Artifact
16.03 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and artifact is creative and clear,
well-suited to excite the stakeholders
14.43 points
Creates one artifact that communicates the results of each project goal
11.22 points
Creates one artifact to communicate the results of the project goals, but artifact contains errors or lacks sufficient detail, information or clarity
0 points
Does not develop an artifact
Score of Results: Artifact,/ 16.03
Conclusions: Project Goals
16.03 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and summary is concise and draws
connections between scope and purpose and results
14.43 points
Summarizes the results of the project and how well each
project goal was met
11.22 points
Summarizes the results of the project in relation to meeting the project goals, but summary is cursory or has gaps in logic
0 points
Does not summarize the results of the project goals
Score of Conclusions: Project Goals,/ 16.03
Conclusions: Strengths and Limitations
16.03 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and illustrates with clarity an insightful awareness of how the results will impact the field in the future
14.43 points
Describes strengths and limitations of meeting project
goals, taking into consideration how the results and created
artifact may influence the public health field
11.22 points
Describes strengths and limitations of meeting project
goals, but description is cursory, illogical, lacks detail, or does not take into consideration how the
results and created artifact may influence the public health field
0 points
Does not describe strengths and limitations of meeting project goals
Score of Conclusions: Strengths and Limitations,/ 16.03
Conclusions: Foundational Competencies
16.03 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
includes artifacts of professional
quality, demonstrating an insightful awareness of the
impact of the project
demonstrates an insightful awareness of the impact of the
project
14.43 points
Summarizes the five
foundational competencies and
how well each was met, including proof of having met
each one
11.22 points
Summarizes the foundational
competencies and includes proof
that they were met, but summary lacks detail or does not
provide proof for each
competency
0 points
Does not provide any evidence of
meeting the five foundational
competencies
Score of Conclusions: Foundational Competencies,/ 16.03
Conclusions: Further Analysis
16.03 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and analysis demonstrates a clear understanding of the site’s mission and why further attention is needed and where
14.43 points
Analyzes areas to the project topic that still need further attention for the practicum site to meet its mission
11.22 points
Analyzes areas to the project topic that still need further attention, but the
analysis is not based on the results of the project, is weak, or
is missing key information
0 points
Does not analyze areas to
the project topic that still need
further attention
Score of Conclusions: Further Analysis,/ 16.03
Articulation of Response
3.82 points
Submission is free of errors to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format
3.44 points
Submission has no major errors to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
2.67 points
Submission has major errors to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical errors to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Score of Articulation of Response,/ 3.82
Total
Score of _ Final Project Part One Guidelines and Rubric,/ 100
Overall Score
Exemplary
91 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Proficient
71 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Needs Improvement
1 point minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Not Evident
0 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Associated Learning Objectives
Learning Objective 01
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Results: Report
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective 01
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Results: Artifact
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective 01
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Conclusions: Foundational Competencies
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective 02
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Conclusions: Project Goals
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective 02
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Conclusions: Strengths and Limitations
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective 02
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Conclusions: Further Analysis
Required Performance: Proficient
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM
(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS
About Our Service
We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.
Qualified Writers
- At ClassicWritersBay.com, most of our writers are degree-holding native speakers of English who are familiar with various writing styles. Our writers are proficient in many fields, including Economics, Business, Accounting, Finance, Medicine, Chemistry, Literature, Mathematics, Statistics, and many others.
- Making our customers happy is an important part of our service. So do not be surprised if you get your paper well before the deadline!
- We pay a lot of attention to ensuring that you get excellent customer service. You can contact our Customer Support Representatives 24/7. When you order from us, you can even track the progress of your paper as it is being written!
- We are attentive to the needs of our customers. Therefore, we follow all your instructions carefully so that you can get the best paper possible.
- It matters to us who writes for you, and we are serious about selecting the best candidates.
- Our writers are always learning something new, so they are familiar with the latest developments in the scientific world and can write papers with updated information and the latest findings.
Our Guarantees:
- Quality original papers that follow your instructions carefully.
- On time delivery – you get the paper before the specified deadline.
- Attentive Customer Support Representatives available 24/7.
- Complete confidentiality – we do not share you details or papers with anybody else.
