Description
Assignment: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
Does this scenario reflect a possible case of sexual harassment? How would you respond to Julie, and what steps might you take next?
Sexual harassment is an important topic in today’s organizations–one that is often addressed through HR presentations and trainings. However, even for experienced nurse managers and HR professionals, it can be challenging to recognize some of the behaviors and actions that may indicate sexual harassment. Nurses in leadership and management positions have a critical responsibility to become attuned to the various interactions that can be problematic, including inappropriate remarks and jokes, improper fraternization, quid pro quo situations, and potentially offensive images.
To prepare
Review the articles, “Sexual Harassment – A Touchy Subject for Nurses,” “Why Are Nurses Leaving? Findings from an Initial Qualitative Study on Nursing,” and “Bullying, Harassment, and Horizontal Violence in the Nursing Workforce.” Consider sexual harassment situations most commonly experienced by nurses.
Think about a work environment with which you are familiar. Have you witnessed or experienced any behaviors that–perhaps with the benefit of hindsight and increasing awareness–may be construed as sexual harassment, even if you did not think of them that way at the time? Do you recall any instances in which you might have intentionally or unintentionally contributed to or participated in an environment that tolerated harassment against one or more individuals? If so, what were your thoughts and feelings at the time? How, perhaps, has your perspective since shifted?
Select one of the following options:
Option 1: Conduct research via the Walden Library, or other scholarly sites, to select an article that presents an authentic example of workplace sexual harassment.
Option 2: Identify an authentic example of suspected or proven sexual harassment from your professional experience.
Conduct research related to your selected example to assess the ramifications that may result from instances of sexual harassment.
Consider how you could partner with HR to mitigate situations of sexual harassment in your workplace. In addition, think about specific steps you could take to diminish inappropriate behaviors in the workplace.
To complete
Unformatted Preview
Name: NURS_6221_Week2_Assignment_Rubric Exit Grid View List View Excellent Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. %7B%220.27000 Fair Poor Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) %7B%220.24000 Points: Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) %7B%220.00000 %7B%220.21000 Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Good Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: Feedback: Feedback: Points: Points: Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) %7B%220.05000 %7B%220.04000 %7B%220.03500 A clear and comprehensive purpose Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Purpose of the assignment is Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) %7B%220.00000 Excellent statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Good Fair Poor brief and not descriptive. vague or off topic. Feedback: Feedback: No purpose statement was provided. Feedback: Feedback: Points: Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) %7B%220.09000 Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) %7B%220.08000 Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback: Points: Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) %7B%220.00000 %7B%220.07000 Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Feedback: Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback: Feedback: Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course Points: Points: Points: Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) %7B%220.18000 Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates %7B%220.16000 Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and %7B%220.14000 Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 %7B%220.00000 Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to Excellent resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources. 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view. Good 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Fair Poor resources to support major points and point of view. support major points and point of view. Feedback: Feedback: Feedback: Feedback: Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) %7B%220.18000 Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Feedback: Points: Points: Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) %7B%220.14000 %7B%220.16000 Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) %7B%220.00000 Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdevelope d. Feedback: Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Feedback: Excellent Good Fair Poor differences, and connections. Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused-neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and Points: Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) %7B%220.05000 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) %7B%220.04000 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) %7B%220.03500 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%79% of the time. Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) %7B%220.00000 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM
(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS
About Our Service
We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.
Qualified Writers
- At ClassicWritersBay.com, most of our writers are degree-holding native speakers of English who are familiar with various writing styles. Our writers are proficient in many fields, including Economics, Business, Accounting, Finance, Medicine, Chemistry, Literature, Mathematics, Statistics, and many others.
- Making our customers happy is an important part of our service. So do not be surprised if you get your paper well before the deadline!
- We pay a lot of attention to ensuring that you get excellent customer service. You can contact our Customer Support Representatives 24/7. When you order from us, you can even track the progress of your paper as it is being written!
- We are attentive to the needs of our customers. Therefore, we follow all your instructions carefully so that you can get the best paper possible.
- It matters to us who writes for you, and we are serious about selecting the best candidates.
- Our writers are always learning something new, so they are familiar with the latest developments in the scientific world and can write papers with updated information and the latest findings.
Our Guarantees:
- Quality original papers that follow your instructions carefully.
- On time delivery – you get the paper before the specified deadline.
- Attentive Customer Support Representatives available 24/7.
- Complete confidentiality – we do not share you details or papers with anybody else.
