Los Angeles City College Childhood Obesity and Early Chronic Diseases Discussion
Los Angeles City College Childhood Obesity and Early Chronic Diseases Discussion
Worldwide, childhood obesity rates are increasing an alarming pace. Consequences of obesity include the development of chronic diseases, and more and more we are seeing these problems develop at an earlier age. For this discussion board, please read Controversy 13: Childhood Obesity and Early Chronic Diseases at the end of Chapter 13 in our textbook Nutrition Concepts and Controversies, 15th ed. After reading that section, please discuss the challenges of obesity; the type of chronic diseases it can lead to; what contributes to obesity; and what can be done to address the problem. Use only the information from the textbook to support your statements and be sure to cite the source properly using APA formatting. Your initial post should be at least 250 words.
PSYC 20039 CQU Hindu Tradition and Practices of Wellbeing Presentation
PSYC 20039 CQU Hindu Tradition and Practices of Wellbeing Presentation
For this assessment you will develop a short (minimum 9, maximum 10 minute) audio-visual presentation on how a religion/spiritual tradition of your choice conceptualises and practices wellbeing. Your audio-visual will include:1. An initial slide/audio identifying the religion/spiritual tradition you are exploring and briefly outlining the main aspects of this tradition (e.g. its origins, where it is practised and how widespread it is, whether it represents a particular sect/interpretation)2. An outline of how this religion/spiritual tradition define(s) (there may be more than one definition) wellbeing/’a good life’ (this will draw on reputable sources i.e. not Wikipedia or websites but spiritual texts, published interpretations, and academic writing) 3. An outline of what beliefs and practices this religion/spiritual tradition sees as integral to wellbeing (this will draw on reputable sources i.e. not Wikipedia or websites but spiritual texts, published interpretations, and academic writing)4. A brief analysis of which definitions, beliefs and practices of this religion/spiritual approach have been found in the research to be related to wellbeing (you may not find research on ‘Buddhist prayer’ or ‘Christian tithing’ and wellbeing, but you will find research on the general practices of prayer and giving for example)5. A discussion of how this approach is similar to and/or different from your own spiritual/religious understanding of wellbeing6. A slide with a list of referencesYou must use APA style for referencing, and provide correct in-text citations, on your slides as well as a complete reference list of those citations on your final slide. In your presentation, you are welcome to use creative ways to present your findings – animation, images, music. You might also simply use PowerPoint which includes audio. This doesn’t have to be an epic masterpiece of filming. If you use photos to support your findings visually they must be source cited if not your own. LENGTH: Your short film will be a minimum of 9 and a maximum of 10 minutes in lengthSUBMISSION DETAILS: Please submit either your narrated/animated PowerPoint video directly into Moodle or submit a word document which includes the link to your film if you’ve uploaded it onto YouTube. Moodle accepts files up to 100MB. If your file is larger than this, you will need to use the YouTube option. Please ensure you create the YouTube video as ‘unlisted’ rather than ‘private’.You need to obtain a minimum grade of 50% for this assessment in order to pass the Unit. PSYC20039 – Interdisciplinary & Cross-cultural Approaches to Wellbeing Marking Rubric for Assessment 2 CriteriaHD D C P FAn outline of the theory, beliefs and practices for achieving wellbeing in this religion/spiritual tradition. The outline is of a very high standard, well considered and accurate. Excellent quality of resources, including peer-reviewed articles or books where available. The outline is of a high standard, well considered and accurate. Good to excellent quality of resources, including peer-reviewed articles or books where available. The outline is of a fair standard, well considered and accurate. Reasonable quality of resources, including peer-reviewed articles or books where available. The outline is of a basic standard. Some inaccuracies.Mixed quality of resources. The outline of beliefs and practices is inaccurate. Suitable resources have not been drawn upon.Summarising the research support for the spiritual/religious thinking and practices and their relationship with wellbeing The summary is of a very high standard. The links made between the beliefs, practices and research are accurate and demonstrate an excellent comprehension of the research evidence. Excellent quality of resources, including peer-reviewed articles or books The summary is of a high standard. The links made between the beliefs, practices and research are accurate and demonstrate a very good comprehension of the research evidence. Very good to excellent quality of resources, including peer-reviewed articles or books The summary is of a good standard. The links made between the beliefs, practices and research are mostly accurate and demonstrate a good comprehension of the research evidence. Good quality of resources, including peer-reviewed articles or books The summary is of a basic standard. The links made between the beliefs, practices and research are mostly accurate and demonstrate a beginning comprehension of the research evidence. Quality of resources, including peer-reviewed articles or books is mixed The summary does not meet the minimum standards. The links made between the beliefs, practices and research are inaccurate and demonstrate limited comprehension of the research evidence. Quality of resources, including peer-reviewed articles or books does not meet academic standards or not includedEvidence of critical thinking in the comparison of one’s own spiritual/religious beliefs and those of religion/spiritual tradition considered in the presentation. A very high level of critical thinking in the comparison.Demonstrates excellent self-insight to identify similarities and differences between one’s own and other’s points of view. A high level of critical thinking in the comparison.Demonstrates very good self-insight to identify similarities and differences between one’s own and other’s points of view. A moderate level of critical thinking in the comparison.Demonstrates moderate self-insight to identify similarities and differences between one’s own and other’s points of view. A basic level of critical thinking in the comparison.Demonstrates some self-insight to identify similarities and differences between one’s own and other’s points of view. Limited critical thinking in the comparison.Demonstrates limited self-insight to identify similarities and differences between one’s own and other’s points of view.The overall quality of the short film and creative thinking utilised to present the program A very high-quality presentation and excellent use of creative thinking in the design and creation. A high-quality presentation and very good use of creative thinking in the design and creation. A moderate-quality presentation and evidence of good creative thinking in the design and creation. A basic-quality presentation Some evidence of creative thinking in the design and creation. A poor-quality presentation and limited evidence of creative thinking in the design and creation.Accuracy of, and adherence to, current APA style referencing. Time limit met.Referencing (in-text citations and Reference list) conforms to current APA style. HD performance is error free. Time limit met. Referencing (in-text citations and Reference list) largely conforms to current APA style. There are some minor errors.Time over or under by 10 seconds. Referencing (in-text citations and Reference list) is somewhat recognisable as current APA style.Time over or under by 25 seconds. Referencing (in-text citations and Reference list) is consistently incorrect and/or not APA style.Time over or under by 50 seconds. No, or very poor, referencing (in-text citations and Reference list). Time over or under by over 1 minute.
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM
(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS
About Our Service
We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.
Qualified Writers
- At ClassicWritersBay.com, most of our writers are degree-holding native speakers of English who are familiar with various writing styles. Our writers are proficient in many fields, including Economics, Business, Accounting, Finance, Medicine, Chemistry, Literature, Mathematics, Statistics, and many others.
- Making our customers happy is an important part of our service. So do not be surprised if you get your paper well before the deadline!
- We pay a lot of attention to ensuring that you get excellent customer service. You can contact our Customer Support Representatives 24/7. When you order from us, you can even track the progress of your paper as it is being written!
- We are attentive to the needs of our customers. Therefore, we follow all your instructions carefully so that you can get the best paper possible.
- It matters to us who writes for you, and we are serious about selecting the best candidates.
- Our writers are always learning something new, so they are familiar with the latest developments in the scientific world and can write papers with updated information and the latest findings.
Our Guarantees:
- Quality original papers that follow your instructions carefully.
- On time delivery – you get the paper before the specified deadline.
- Attentive Customer Support Representatives available 24/7.
- Complete confidentiality – we do not share you details or papers with anybody else.
