Genetics and Community Health

Genetics and Community Health
DescriptionAs part of this module’s studies, we learned how public and community health services and interventions are important to the delivery of care in a variety of settings in the community. The national initiative to improve the nation’s health, i.e., Healthy People 2020. (n.d.) is a prevention initiative focusing on improving the health of Americans. The Healthy People 2020 model focuses on critical determinant interventions for supporting a society in which all people live long, healthy lives. The critical determinants need to be monitored and evaluated to improve the health of our society. While all the determinants are important, they also interact with one another. Genetics is one such interaction area. Nurses are now beginning to see changes in care that includes creating patient genetic profiles. The genetic profile is a tool that allows nurses to support patients with information regarding genomic risk for disease, how drugs and genes may interact, and what may be available to manage those risks.Tasks:Conduct a review of the current state of tools available to the public for conducting and managing their family genome profile. Differentiate between the tools you discover to identify which ones are most focused on health concerns. Create an educational flyer that shows what you believe are the top tools and how they differ in what they deliver to the public. The flyer should be suitable for use by your classmates to educate patients on credible tools for creating a family genome profile.Create an educational flyer suitable for use by classmates at your or a fictional place of employment. Your flyer message should:Identify why it is important for nurses to educate and guide patients in the completion of a family genomic profile.Describe the ethical and political implications surrounding family genomic profiles.Provide a minimum of four different family genomic profile tools that are available to the public.Identify minimum of one resource or tool that is available at your or a fictional workplace that can be used to support nurses in guiding patients in beginning a family genomic profile.Describe how the nurse would use one of these tools to improve care and, in turn, outcomes.Provide a reference list on the flyer that includes online resources with Internet links for ease of access by your classmates.Your submission should include both the educational flyer and an assignment reference list that includes references from the flyer as well as your scholarly references. There should be minimum four scholarly references. Your assignment reference list will be submitted with the flyer as an attached Microsoft Word document.Submission Details:By the due date assigned, post your educational flyer with an attached reference list to the Submissions Area.Support your findings with examples and scholarly references. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.Reference:Healthy People 2020. (n.d.). Educational and community-based programs. Retrieved from https://ift.tt/3lur0ZH

DIscussion Post

DIscussion Post
Discussion: GroupsThe dynamic and increasingly complex world of health care often requires nurses to work collaboratively on interprofessional teams. In the group environment, individuals with unique skills and expertise come together to focus on a common goal; however, groups must become cohesive before they can become effective.Your experiences working with groups—whether you perceive them as positive, negative, or neutral—can be used to facilitate insight and development. Health care, with its focus on interprofessional teamwork and collaboration, offers ample opportunities and an imperative for continuous learning.For this Discussion, you focus on strategies for facilitating the group process.To prepare:Review the information in this week’s Learning Resources regarding the stages of group formation, problematic roles individuals play in groups, and strategies for facilitating and maintaining positive group collaboration. In particular, review Learning Exercise 19.14 of the course text.Reflect on various groups with which you have been or are currently involved. Select one specific group to analyze for the purposes of this Discussion. Identify the purpose or task that the group is or was meant to perform.Consider the four stages of group formation (forming, storming, norming, and performing). How would you describe the progression between stages? Is there a stage in which you believe your group is or was “stuck”?Consider the task or group-building role you normally play in a group setting. How could you apply the information from the Learning Resources to improve your group participation and facilitation, as well as the functioning of the group as a whole?In addition, think about which individuals within your group (including yourself) may fall into problematic roles such as the Dominator, the Aggressor, or the Blocker. How have you and your group members addressed the enactment of these roles and its impact on interactions? With information from the Learning Resources in mind, what strategies would you apply now or going forwarList of ResourcesLearning ResourcesNote: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.Required ReadingsMarquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (2017). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. Chapter 19 “Organizational, Interpersonal, and Group Communication”Chapter 19 covers many aspects of the communication process, including group communication. As you read this chapter, focus on the stages of group development (forming, storming, norming, performing) and group dynamics (group task roles, group building and maintenance roles, problematic roles). Consider how you can apply these concepts as you engage in group work.Adams, S. L., & Anantatmula, V. (2010). Social and behavioral influences on team process. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 89–98. Social and Behavioral Influences on Team Process by Adams, S. L.; Anantatmula, V., in Project Management Journal, Vol. 41/Issue 4. Copyright 2010 by PMI Publications. Reprinted by permission of PMI Publications via the Copyright Clearance Center.In this article, the authors report on the effects of individual behaviors on project teams and provide a model that identifies the progress of social and behavioral development. For each stage, the authors provide recommendations for managing team members.Chun, J. S., & Choi, J. N. (2014). Members’ needs, intragroup conflict, and group performance. The Journal Of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 437–450. doi:10.1037/a0036363This study theorizes and empirically investigates the relationships among the psychological needs of group members, intragroup conflict, and group performance.Haynes, J., & Strickler, J. (2014). TeamSTEPPS makes strides for better communication. Nursing,44(1), 62–63. doi:10.1097/01.NURSE.0000438725.66087.89Teamwork and communication are the focus of this article and include the use of the TeamStepps model for Quality Improvement.Hogg, M. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E., III. (2012). Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 232–255.Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.The authors of this article introduce a theory on intergroup leadership that is based on social theory and intergroup relations. This theory purports that intergroup performance relies on a leader’s capacity to create intergroup relational identities.Kaufman, B. (2012). Anatomy of dysfunctional working relationships. Business Strategy Series, 13(2), 102–106.Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.Kaufman examines the impact of dysfunctional working relationships in an organization. She provides managers with tips that will allow them to identify early warning signs of dysfunctional behavior and to minimize its effects in the workplace.Mind Tools. (2012). Forming, storming, norming and performing: Helping new teams perform effectively, quickly. Retrieved from https://ift.tt/3ambhWa web article discusses stages of team development and provides strategies for moving through the early stages effectively.Mind Tools. (2009). Team charters. Retrieved from https://ift.tt/3BonyVX web page features helpful information about team charters. Before you begin work on the Week 7 Assignment, you may find it helpful to create a charter that can guide your group’s work together.Ortega, A., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Rico, R. (2013). Enhancing team learning in nursing teams through beliefs about interpersonal context. Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 69(1), 102–111. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05996.xThis article examines the relationship between team-level learning and performance in nursing teams, and the role of beliefs about the interpersonal context in this relationship.Table Group. (n.d.). Retrieved July 24, 2012, from https://ift.tt/3uV6KmI Lencioni is recognized worldwide for his work on teams. Under the Patrick Lencioni link, download and read articles related to addressing team dysfunctions.Optional ResourcesMarquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (2017). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. Chapter 16, “Socializing and Educating Staff for Team Building in a Learning OrganizatioOutstanding PerformanceExcellent PerformanceCompetent PerformanceProficient PerformanceRoom for ImprovementMain Posting:Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.44 (44%) – 44 (44%)Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. supported by at least 3 current, credible sources40 (40%) – 43 (43%)Responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to most of the discussion question(s) is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references31 (31%) – 34 (34%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s) one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references0 (0%) – 30 (30%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. contains only 1 or no credible referencesMain Posting:Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Written clearly and concisely Contains no grammatical or spelling errors Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Written clearly and concisely May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Written concisely May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Written somewhat concisely May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors Contains some APA formatting errors0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Not written clearly or concisely Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and styleMain Posting:Timely and full participation10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts main discussion by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participationFirst Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic, may have some depth0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic, lacks depthFirst Response: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are citedFirst Response:Timely and full participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participationSecond Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic, may have some depth0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic, lacks depthSecond Response:Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are citedSecond Response:Timely and full participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely and full participation Posts by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participationTotal Points: 100Name: NURS_6053_Week5_Discussion_Rubric

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL - NO PLAGIARISM

(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

The Best Custom Essay Writing Service

About Our Service

We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.

Qualified Writers

Our Guarantees:

CLICK TO SUBMIT YOUR ORDER