Description

Of the five employees, Amani has the most tenure with six years. 
Amani seems to have the lowest morale and is not motivated to do the 
work, although he is quite capable of doing it successfully. Bassmah has
been with the company for four years but has not mastered the new 
software and is performing at a low level even three months after being 
trained on the software. Hadeel also has four years with the company and
Rawan has two years. Hadeel and Rawan are responsible for client 
contact, and while in the past they worked well together on reaching out
to clients, now there are conflicts and low morale. Samah has been with
the company just three months and does not understand what is expected 
on the job and is contemplating leaving the company. 
Approach the case as the branch manager well versed in situational leadership.
undefined
Explain situational leadership to your Vice President.
Determine the readiness level of each employee and explain your reasoning.
Determine the appropriate leader behavior to match the employee level and explain your reasoning.
Develop a plan of action as to how you will lead each person to  higher performance and morale and explain it to your Vice President.
Directions:
Write an essay that includes an introduction paragraph, the  essay’s body, and a conclusion paragraph to address the assignment’s  guide questions. Do not address the questions using a  question-and-answer format.

Unformatted Preview
SEU MGT560 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 2 Exceeds Expectation Content, Research, and Analysis 21-25 Points Requirements Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 21-25 Points Content Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions. 25-30 Points Analysis Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 13-15 Points Sources Sources go above and beyond required criteria and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Mechanics and Writing 5 Points Demonstrates Project is clearly college-level organized, well proficiency in written, and in organization, proper format as grammar and outlined in the style. assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure, contains no errors in grammar, spelling, Meets Expectation Below Expectation 16-20 Points Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 16-20 Points Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions. 19-24 Points Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 10-12 Points Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 11-15 Points Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 11-15 Points Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions. 4 Points Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure, may include a few 3 Points Project is poorly organized and written and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development, 13-18 Points Provides poor though, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 7-9 Points Sources meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Limited Evidence 6-10 Points Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6-10 Points Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions. 7-12 Points Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 4-6 Points Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. 1-2 Points Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, SEU MGT560 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 2 APA style, or APA citations and references. Total points possible = 100 minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style or APA citations and references. and APA citations and references.

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM

(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

The Best Custom Essay Writing Service

About Our Service

We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.

Qualified Writers

Our Guarantees:

CLICK TO SUBMIT YOUR ORDER