· Recall the program that you proposed in Week 4. If needed, review your previous work related to the program, client needs, and the logic model. Process evaluation considers the inputs, including resources and activities, recorded in the logic model and how they have been applied.
· Suppose your program proposal was approved, and the program was implemented at your agency, practice, or community setting. You must now develop a plan to evaluate the process of implementation. In other words, you must determine if the program is working as it was originally intended. 
Submit a 4-page plan for a process evaluation based on the new program that you proposed earlier in the course.
· Provide a summary of the program and the needs of the target population.
· Explain why a process evaluation would be important for the program.
· State the type of process evaluation and stage of implementation (when in the program it will occur) and why.
· Determine who will conduct the process evaluation (internal or external evaluator).
· Include a broad question to be answered by the process evaluation (overarching question).
· Identify specific questions to be answered by the process evaluation (subquestions).
· Describe a plan for gathering and analyzing the information.
· Describe a plan for ongoing evaluations (how often, etc.).
LEARNING RESOURCES
· Dudley, J. R. (2020).  Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
· Chapter 8, “Improving How Programs and Practice Work”
· Read “Implement the Intervention as Proposed” (pp. 175–179).
· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.).  . https://www.cdc.gov/std/program/pupestd/types%20of%20evaluation.pdf 
· TSNE. (2018, June 14).  . https://www.tsne.org/blog/process-evaluation-vs-outcome-evaluation 
Process Evaluation Studies
· Lachman, J. M., Kelly, J., Cluver, L., Ward, C. L.,  Hutchings, J., & Gardner, F. (2018).  .  Research on Social Work Practice,  28(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516645665
· Vil, C. S., & Angel, A. (2018).  .  Social Work,  63(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swy033

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM

(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

The Best Custom Essay Writing Service

About Our Service

We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.

Qualified Writers

Our Guarantees:

CLICK TO SUBMIT YOUR ORDER