PSY 326 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric (Detailed Outline and Annotated Bibliography)
This milestone contains two parts: Part 1, a detailed outline, and Part 2, an annotated bibliography.
Part 1: Detailed Outline: The detailed outline should serve as the framework upon which you will build your final paper. By outlining the paper in advance, students will find the weaknesses or areas in their paper that need more development so that students may address these areas before submitting a final draft. The outline should be in standard outline format and should include the final project’s Critical Elements I–V: Introduction, Why the Event Occurred Theory I, Why the Event Occurred Theory II, Analysis—Basic Perceptual and Cognitive Processes, and Analysis—Dual Process Model.
The below example, taken from Purdue OWL, demonstrates the full sentence outline method you are to employ for this assignment:
I. Man-made pollution is the primary cause of global warming. a. Greenhouse gas emissions are widely identified by the scientific community to be harmful.
i. The burning of coal and fossil fuels is the primary releaser of hazardous greenhouse gases.
Within each main area, students should subdivide the topics using the above outline structure to lay out the main points in each major section. Include the references planned for each section and the potential thesis sentences you will be using. The more detail provided, the better your instructor can advise you on how to revise the work before you submit your final draft in Module Seven.
For Part 1: Detailed Outline, specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
• Incorporates a sentence-style outline
• Addresses Section I of the Final Project: Research Paper – Introduction
• Addresses Section II of the Final Project: Research Paper – Why the Event Occurred: Theory I
• Addresses Section III of the Final Project: Research Paper – Why the Event Occurred: Theory II
• Addresses Section IV of the Final Project: Research Paper – Analysis—Basic Perceptual and Cognitive Processes
• Addresses Section V of the Final Project: Research Paper – Analysis—Dual Process Model
This resource will also be helpful to you as you formulate your outline: Four Main Components for Effective Outlines
Part 2: Annotated Bibliography: Annotated bibliographies provide you with the opportunity to cite, summarize, and compare and contrast resources you will use in a paper. You will cite each resource in APA style, write an approximately 150-word description that summarizes the central theme and scope of the resource, and compare and contrast it with other resources. For more information on annotated bibliographies, consult Shapiro Library section of the Academic Support module within your course.

Depending on the assignment, the annotated bibliography may serve a number of purposes, including but not limited to reviewing the literature on a particular subject, illustrating the quality of research you have done, providing examples of the types of resources available, describing other items on a topic that may be of interest to the reader, and/or exploring the subject for further research. Your purpose here is to prepare to complete a final research paper that addresses two major questions:
1. How does the literature in social cognition and perception help explain a real-world event? 2. Based on the literature, how could this event have happened differently had it occurred in a different culture?
To successfully complete the annotated bibliography, you should locate a minimum of three to five current research articles (from the past three years) that you might potentially include in your final paper. Choose works that provide a variety of perspectives on your topic. In your annotation, you should pay attention to the points listed below. (Source: https://libguides.skidmore.edu/annotatedbibliography)
It is important to understand the difference between an annotated bibliography and a literature review particularly when you get to your capstone course (PSY- 444). Please review this document and keep it as a resource for future reference.
For Part 2: Annotated Bibliography, specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
• Summarize the central theme of the resource.
• Include a paragraph in which you do the following: o Evaluate the author’s authority or background. o Explain how this resource will work in conjunction with other cited works to illuminate the research topic.
The detailed outline and annotated bibliography is due in Module Five.
Sample Annotated Bibliography of a Journal Article: The following example is what your final product for each resource should look like. This example (for the psychological research article A Bad Taste in the Mouth: Gustatory Disgust Influences Moral Judgment) employs APA style for the journal citation. The writer of this annotation follows the above points to create an annotation that summarizes the article’s main points and draws connections between that resource and other resources:
Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295–299.
Annotation: In this article, Eskine and colleagues describe the results of an experiment that examined whether the taste in a person’s mouth influences the moral judgments that the person makes. The authors, who are researchers at the City University of New York, hypothesized that there would be a relationship between these two variables because prior research has shown that there are strong links between basic emotions and moral judgments. Indeed, the authors found that participants given a bitter drink made harsher moral judgments than those given a non-bitter drink. This article is extremely useful for my paper because it provides evidence that seemingly unimportant sensory information can influence moral judgments. Also, it nicely complements the work of Chapman

et al. (2009), who found that emotional disgust and morality utilize similar brain regions. One limitation, though, is that all of the participants in the study were college students. They may have responded differently to the moral situations than older or younger participants.
Abstract from author: Can sweet-tasting substances trigger kind, favorable judgments about other people? What about substances that are disgusting and bitter? Various studies have linked physical disgust to moral disgust, but despite the rich and sometimes striking findings these studies have yielded, no research has explored morality in conjunction with taste, which can vary greatly and may differentially affect cognition. The research reported here tested the effects of taste perception on moral judgments. After consuming a sweet beverage, a bitter beverage, or water, participants rated a variety of moral transgressions. Results showed that taste perception significantly affected moral judgments, such that physical disgust (induced via a bitter taste) elicited feelings of moral disgust. Further, this effect was more pronounced in participants with politically conservative views than in participants with politically liberal views. Taken together, these differential findings suggest that embodied gustatory experiences may affect moral processing more than previously thought.
Guidelines for Submission: Your detailed outline and annotated bibliography should follow these formatting guidelines: be 4–6 pages, double spaced, use 12- point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and have citations in APA.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Part 1: Sentence Style
Meets “Proficient” criteria and addresses all major final project components in enough detail that reader can clearly see how the paper will flow, what evidence will be marshaled, and what conclusions will be drawn
Uses a sentence style outline to lay out the major points of the paper and enough detail to describe generally how the paper will flow and what arguments will be made
Outline is not in sentence style OR does not include sufficient detail
Annotation is not in sentence style
10
Part 1: Section I Outline—
Introduction
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and proposed analysis of the underpinnings of the event is logical and well argued
Includes sufficient detail regarding what event occurred and what might have led up to the event
Includes enough background information regarding what event occurred and what might have led to the event
Does not include enough background information regarding what event occurred and what might have led to the event
10
Part 1: Section II— Why the Event
Occurred: Theory I
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and the theory selected is described in detail to make a compelling case for why the theory has explanatory power
Clearly identifies an appropriate theory, and application to explain the event is logical
Attempt to apply a theory to explain the event is lacking in detail
Student does not attempt to apply a theory to explain the event
10
Part 1: Section III— Why the Event
Occurred: Theory II
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and the theory selected is described in detail to make a compelling case for why the theory has explanatory power
Clearly identifies an appropriate theory, and application to explain the event is logical
Attempt to apply a theory to explain the event is lacking in detail
Student does not attempt to apply a theory to explain the event
10

Part 1: Section IV—
Analysis: Basic Perceptual and
Cognitive Processes
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and the link to the event is described in enough detail to make a compelling case for why the perceptual and cognitive processes are linked to the event
Identifies a basic cognitive process and a basic perceptual process and their link to the event is logical
Student does not sufficiently identity cognitive or perceptual processes OR the description of one or both of them is insufficient to logically link them to the event
Student does not attempt to link any basic cognitive or perceptual processes to the event
10
Part 1: Section V— Analysis: Dual Process
Model
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and the discussion of the dual process model is supported with research to prove the importance of these processes more generally
Identifies both an automatic and controlled component at play during this event, and the components identified are logical
Minimally identifies the components OR the description is insufficient to logically link them to the event
Student does not attempt to identify an automatic or controlled process
10
Part 2: Summarize Theme
Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes sufficient detail to make obvious how the research is related to the current topic
Each annotation describes the central theme of the research in a compelling way
Annotations insufficiently describe the central theme of the research in a compelling way
No annotations describe the central theme of the research in a compelling way
10
Part 2: Author’s Authority or Background
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and authority is directly related to the current research topic
Annotations evaluate the authority or background of the author and provide specific detail
Annotations evaluate the authority or background of the author but lack detail
Annotations do not evaluate the authority or background of the author
10
Explain Meets “Proficient” criteria and discussion is supported with research
Annotations explicitly describe how they work with at least one other annotation to inform the research topic, and discussion is detailed and logical
Annotations insufficiently describe how they work with at least one other annotation to inform the research topic
Annotations do not describe how each annotation works
10
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total 100%

PSY 326 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric (Detailed Outline and Annotated Bibliography)

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM

(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

The Best Custom Essay Writing Service

About Our Service

We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.

Qualified Writers

Our Guarantees:

CLICK TO SUBMIT YOUR ORDER