Unformatted Preview
ESPE 6103 Ethical Issues in Sport Module 5 Reflection and Philosophy Paper 60 points Overview Three major ethical theories were discussed in Powerpoint materials. Ethical theories provide the framework to help base individual and organization-wide decision-making. Instructions Major ethical theories, as well as other ethics principles are reviewed in the PowerPoint slides in Course Documents. Write your personal ethics and philosophical theory based on either: Virtue Ethics, Teleological, and Deontological. Explain which theory guides your decision-making in your personal life, as well as in your future professional employment. Include personal experiences that have helped shape your ethical philosophy and decision-making skills. As future professional leaders, provide your leadership style that will help ensure moral conduct in your workplace. Identify specific practices you would employ to guide better decision-making. Base your personal philosophy on your background, experiences, and choices made. These theories may also be researched further on the Internet if desired. Submit as a Word document. Minimum FOUR, double-spaced pages. Include a cover page (not included in page numbering). Follow APA format if references are used. Evaluation Rubric Use the following rubric to guide your work. Unsatisfactory Criteria 60% or below Arkansas State University Developing Proficient Exemplary 70+% 80+% 90+% Page 1 of 2 ESPE 6103 Ethical Issues in Sport Organization (40%) Content (40%) Source Material (20%) Ideas may not be focused or developed; the main purpose is not clear. The introduction is undeveloped. Main points are difficult to identify. Transitions may be needed. There is no conclusion or may not be clear the presentation has concluded. Conclusion does not tie back to the introduction. Main idea is evident, but the organizational structure many need to be strengthened; ideas may not clearly developed or always flow smoothly and the purpose is not clearly stated. The introduction may not be well developed. Main points are not clear. Transitions may be awkward. Supporting material may lack in development. The conclusion may need additional development. Organizational structure needs little work. Ideas are mostly developed and main purpose is mostly clearly stated. Transitions are satisfactory but need some improvement. Supporting material evident but needs some improvement. Conclusion is mostly clear. Ideas are clearly organized, developed, and supported to achieve a purpose; the purpose is clear. The introduction gets the attention of the audience and clearly states the specific purpose of the speech. Main points are clear and organized effectively. The conclusion is satisfying and relates back to introduction. Student does not have grasp of information. Student did not attend to the requirements of the lesson. Source material incorporated but sometimes inappropriately or unclearly. Documentation is accurate only occasionally. Student has a partial grasp of the information. Some of the of lesson’s requirements were fulfilled. Student mainly grasps the information. Most of the of lesson’s requirements were fulfilled. Student has a clear grasp of information. The lesson’s requirements were all fulfilled. Source material incorporated adequately and usually documented accurately. Sources documented somewhate accurately. Source material incorporated logically and mostly accurate. Source material is incorporated logically & insightfully. Sources are documented accurately. Arkansas State University Page 2 of 2 ESPE 6103 Ethical Issues in Sport Module 5 Reflection and Philosophy Paper 60 points Overview Three major ethical theories were discussed in Powerpoint materials. Ethical theories provide the framework to help base individual and organization-wide decision-making. Instructions Major ethical theories, as well as other ethics principles are reviewed in the PowerPoint slides in Course Documents. Write your personal ethics and philosophical theory based on either: Virtue Ethics, Teleological, and Deontological. Explain which theory guides your decision-making in your personal life, as well as in your future professional employment. Include personal experiences that have helped shape your ethical philosophy and decision-making skills. As future professional leaders, provide your leadership style that will help ensure moral conduct in your workplace. Identify specific practices you would employ to guide better decision-making. Base your personal philosophy on your background, experiences, and choices made. These theories may also be researched further on the Internet if desired. Submit as a Word document. Minimum FOUR, double-spaced pages. Include a cover page (not included in page numbering). Follow APA format if references are used. Evaluation Rubric Use the following rubric to guide your work. Unsatisfactory Criteria 60% or below Arkansas State University Developing Proficient Exemplary 70+% 80+% 90+% Page 1 of 2 ESPE 6103 Ethical Issues in Sport Organization (40%) Content (40%) Source Material (20%) Ideas may not be focused or developed; the main purpose is not clear. The introduction is undeveloped. Main points are difficult to identify. Transitions may be needed. There is no conclusion or may not be clear the presentation has concluded. Conclusion does not tie back to the introduction. Main idea is evident, but the organizational structure many need to be strengthened; ideas may not clearly developed or always flow smoothly and the purpose is not clearly stated. The introduction may not be well developed. Main points are not clear. Transitions may be awkward. Supporting material may lack in development. The conclusion may need additional development. Organizational structure needs little work. Ideas are mostly developed and main purpose is mostly clearly stated. Transitions are satisfactory but need some improvement. Supporting material evident but needs some improvement. Conclusion is mostly clear. Ideas are clearly organized, developed, and supported to achieve a purpose; the purpose is clear. The introduction gets the attention of the audience and clearly states the specific purpose of the speech. Main points are clear and organized effectively. The conclusion is satisfying and relates back to introduction. Student does not have grasp of information. Student did not attend to the requirements of the lesson. Source material incorporated but sometimes inappropriately or unclearly. Documentation is accurate only occasionally. Student has a partial grasp of the information. Some of the of lesson’s requirements were fulfilled. Student mainly grasps the information. Most of the of lesson’s requirements were fulfilled. Student has a clear grasp of information. The lesson’s requirements were all fulfilled. Source material incorporated adequately and usually documented accurately. Sources documented somewhate accurately. Source material incorporated logically and mostly accurate. Source material is incorporated logically & insightfully. Sources are documented accurately. Arkansas State University Page 2 of 2

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL - NO PLAGIARISM

(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

The Best Custom Essay Writing Service

About Our Service

We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.

Qualified Writers

Our Guarantees:

CLICK TO SUBMIT YOUR ORDER