Rubric

NR705 Final Draft Literature Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention JAN21

NR705 Final Draft Literature Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention JAN21
Criteria Ratings Pts
Literature Synthesis

1)Identifies search strategy utilized to identify sources to include appropriate databases such as CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed. Do not use Google Scholar or general search engine. Discusses key words utilized including combination of keywords, total articles found and inclusion/exclusion criteria to narrow search.

2)Synthesizes 10-12 research articles that are Evidence Level 1, 2 or 3 (unless faculty approved) to support evidence-based intervention. Describe how the intervention has been utilized to solve a similar problem by defining common themes found in the literature.

3) References are less than 5 years old (unless seminal) and professional. PermaLink of all articles is attached.

70 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements with excellent literature synthesis.

63 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements with very good literature synthesis.

56 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes all requirements with basic literature synthesis.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
All literature synthesis requirements not provided or poor literature synthesis.

70 pts
Literature synthesis table

1) Completed with evidence level and quality (High, Good, Low or major flaws) identified for each article, including appropriate appraisal of the level of evidence.

2) Identifies appropriate study design.

3) Accurately assesses how the article can inform the project. If article does not inform the project, then it should not be used.

30 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Meets all requirements for this section.

27 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

24 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
No requirements for this section presented.

30 pts
Evidence-Based Intervention

1) Rationale for chosen evidence-based intervention is provided and up-to-date references support the intervention.

2) Discusses how chosen evidence-based intervention is appropriate for project site and
resources

3) Discuss chosen evidence-based intervention in-depth including each of the following aspects:
•Protocol illustrated as a Table or Appendix (as applicable)
•Information Sheet illustrated as a Table or Appendix
•Informed or Implied Consent process discussed and illustrated as an Appendix
•Education plan discussed and illustrated as a Table or Appendix
•Plan for implementation identified and discussed. The reader should be able to implement your intervention without any questions left unanswered.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Meets all requirements for this section with an excellent description of the evidence-based intervention.

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Meets all requirements with a very good description of the evidence-based intervention.

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements with a basic description of the evidence-based intervention.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Less than 2 requirements for this section presented or provides a poor description of the evidence-based intervention.

40 pts
Clarity of Writing

1)Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure.

2) No spelling errors or typographical errors.

3) Organized around the required components using appropriate headers.

5 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Meets all requirements for this section.

4 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

3 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
No requirements for this section presented.

5 pts
Clarity of Writing

All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA (7th ed.) format.

1) Document setup

2) Title and reference pages

3) Citations in the text and references

5 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Meets all requirements for this section.

4 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

3 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
No requirements for this section presented.

5 pts
Total Points: 150

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL – NO PLAGIARISM

(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS

The Best Custom Essay Writing Service

About Our Service

We are an online academic writing company that connects talented freelance writers with students in need of their services. Unlike other writing companies, our team is made up of native English speakers from countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand.

Qualified Writers

Our Guarantees:

CLICK TO SUBMIT YOUR ORDER